Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now


ASP.NET und mehr ...

Mehr oder weniger regelmäßig werden Artikel auf meinem Blog auf ASP.NET Zone veröffentlicht: ASP.NET und mehr...

Customizing ASP.​NET Core Part 02: Configuration

Monday, September 24, 2018 12:00 AM

This second part of the blog series about customizing ASP.NET Core is about the application configuration, how to use it and how to customize the configuration to use different ways to configure your app.

The series topics

Configure the configuration

As well as the logging, since ASP.NET Core 2.0 the configuration is also hidden in the default configuration of the WebHostBuilder and not part of the Startup.cs anymore. This is done for the same reasons to keep the Startup clean and simple:

public class Program
    public static void Main(string[] args)

    public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string[] args) =>

Fortunately you are also able to override the default settings to customize the the configuration in a way you need it.

When you create a new ASP.NET Core project you already have an appsettings.json and an appsettings.Development.json configured. You can and you should use this configuration files to configure your app. You should because this is the pre-configured way and the most ASP.NET Core developers will look for an appsettings.json to configure the application. This is absolutely fine and works pretty well.

But maybe you already have an existing XML configuration or want to share a YAML configuration file over different kind of applications. This could also make sense. Sometimes it makes also sense to read configuration values out of a database.

The next snippet shows the hidden default configuration to read the appsettigns.json files:

    .ConfigureAppConfiguration((builderContext, config) =>
        var env = builderContext.HostingEnvironment;

        config.AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", optional: false, reloadOnChange: true);
        config.AddJsonFile($"appsettings.{env.EnvironmentName}.json", optional: true, reloadOnChange: true);

This configuration also set the base path of the application and adds the configuration via environment variables. The method ConfigureAppConfiguration accepts a lambda method that gets a ConfigurationBuilderContext and a ConfigurationBuilder passed in

Whenever you customize the the application configuration you should add the configuration via environment variable as the last step. The order of the configuration matters and the latter added configuration providers will override the previously added configurations. Be sure the environment variables always override the configurations via file. This way you ensure the configure on azure web apps via the Application Settings UI on Azure which will be passed to the application as environment variables.

The IConfigurationBuilder has a lot of extension methods to add more configurations like XML or INI configuration files, in-memory configurations and so on. You can find a lot more configuration providers provided by the community to read in YAML files, database values and a lot more. In this demo I'm going to show you how to read INI files in.

Typed configurations

Before trying to read the INI files it makes sense to show how to use typed configuration instead of reading the configuration via the IConfiguration key by key.

To read a type configuration you need to define the type to configure. I usually crate a class called AppSettings like this:

public class AppSettings
    public int Foo { get; set; }
    public string Bar { get; set; }

This classes than can be filled with specific configuration sections inside the method ConfigureServices in the Startup.cs


This way the typed configuration also gets registered as a service in the dependency injection container and can be used everywhere in the application. You are able to create different configuration types per configuration section. In the most cases one section should be fine, but maybe it makes sense to divide the settings into different sections.

This configuration than can be used via dependency injection in every part of your application. The next snippets shows how to use the configuration in a MVC controller:

public class HomeController : Controller
    private readonly AppSettings _options;

    public HomeController(IOptions options)
        _options = options.Value;

The IOptions is a wrapper around our AppSettings type and the property Value contains the actual instance of the AppSettings including the values from the configuration file.

To try that out the appsettings.json need to have the AppSettings section configured, otherwise the values are null or not set.

  "Logging": {
    "LogLevel": {
      "Default": "Warning"
  "AllowedHosts": "*",
  "AppSettings": {
      "Foo": 123,
      "Bar": "Bar"

Configuration using INI files

To also use INI files to configure the application we need to add the INI configuration inside the method ConfigureAppConfiguration in the Program.cs:

config.AddIniFile("appsettings.ini", optional: false, reloadOnChange: true);
config.AddJsonFile($"appsettings.{env.EnvironmentName}.ini", optional: true, reloadOnChange: true);

This code loads the INI files the same way as the JSON configuration files. The first line is a required configuration and the second one an optional configuration depending on the current runtime environment.

The INI file could look like this:


This file also contains a section called AppSettings and a property called Bar. Initially I wrote the order of the configuration matters. If you added the two lines to configure via INI files after the configuration via JSON files, the INI files will override the settings from the JSON files. The property Bar gets overridden with "FooBar" and the property Foo stays the same. Also the values out of the INI file will be available via the previously created AppSettings class.

Every other configuration provider will work the same way. Let's see how a configuration provider would look like.

Configuration Providers

A configuration provider is an implementation of an IConfigurationProvider that get's created by an configuration source, which is an implementation of an IConfigurationSource. The configuration provider than reads the date in from somewhere and provides it via a Dictionary.

To add a custom or third party configuration provider to ASP.NET Core you need to call the method Add on the configuration builder and put the configuration source in:

    .ConfigureAppConfiguration((builderContext, config) =>
        var env = builderContext.HostingEnvironment;

        config.AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", optional: false, reloadOnChange: true);
        config.AddJsonFile($"appsettings.{env.EnvironmentName}.json", optional: true, reloadOnChange: true);
        // add new configuration source
        config.Add(new MyCustomConfigurationSource{
        	SourceConfig = //configure whatever source 
            Optional = false,
            ReloadOnChange = true

Usually you would create an extension method to easier add the configuration source:

config.AddMyCustomSource("source", optional: false, reloadOnChange: true);

A really detailed concrete example about how to create a custom configuration provider is written by the fellow MVP Andrew Lock.


In the most cases it is not needed to add a different configuration provider or to create your own configuration provider, but it's good to know how to change it in case you need it. Also using typed configuration is a nice way to read the settings. In classic ASP.NET we used a manually created façade to to read the application settings in a typed way. Now this s automatically done by just providing a class. This class get's automatically filled and provided via dependency injection.

To learn more about ASP.NET Core Dependency Injection have a look into the next part of the series: Customizing ASP.NET Core Part 02: Dependency Injection (not yet done)

Customizing ASP.​NET Core Part 01: Logging

Thursday, September 20, 2018 12:00 AM

In this first part of the new blog series about customizing ASP.NET Core, I will show you how to customize the logging. The default logging only writes to the console or to the debug window. This is quite good for the most cases, but maybe you need to log to a sink like a file or a database. Maybe you want to extend the logger with additional information. In that cases you need to know how to change the default logging.

The series topics

Configure logging

In previous versions of ASP.NET Core (pre 2.0) the logging was configured in the Startup.cs. Since 2.0 the Startup.cs was simplified and a lot of configurations where moved to a default WebHostBuilder, which is called in the Program.cs. Also the logging was moved to the default WebHostBuilder:

public class Program
    public static void Main(string[] args)

    public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string[] args) =>

In ASP.NET Core you are able to override and customize almost everything. So you can with the logging. The IWebHostBuilder has a lot of extension methods to override the default behavior. To override the default settings for the logging we need to choose the ConfigureLogging method. The next snippet shows exactly the same logging as it was configured inside the CreateDefaultBuilder() method:

    .ConfigureLogging((hostingContext, logging) =>

This method needs a lambda that gets a WebHostBuilderContext that contains the hosting context and a LoggingBuilder to configure the logging.

Create a custom logger

To demonstrate a custom logger, I created a small useless logger that is able to colorize log entries with an specific log level in the console. This so called ColoredConsoleLogger will be added and created using a LoggerProvider we also need to write by our own. To specify the color and the log level to colorize, we need to add a configuration class. In the next snippet all three parts (Logger, LoggerProvider and Configuration) are shown:

public class ColoredConsoleLoggerConfiguration
    public LogLevel LogLevel { get; set; } = LogLevel.Warning;
    public int EventId { get; set; } = 0;
    public ConsoleColor Color { get; set; } = ConsoleColor.Yellow;

public class ColoredConsoleLoggerProvider : ILoggerProvider
    private readonly ColoredConsoleLoggerConfiguration _config;
    private readonly ConcurrentDictionary _loggers = new ConcurrentDictionary();

    public ColoredConsoleLoggerProvider(ColoredConsoleLoggerConfiguration config)
        _config = config;

    public ILogger CreateLogger(string categoryName)
        return _loggers.GetOrAdd(categoryName, name => new ColoredConsoleLogger(name, _config));

    public void Dispose()

public class ColoredConsoleLogger : ILogger
	private static object _lock = new Object();
    private readonly string _name;
    private readonly ColoredConsoleLoggerConfiguration _config;

    public ColoredConsoleLogger(string name, ColoredConsoleLoggerConfiguration config)
        _name = name;
        _config = config;

    public IDisposable BeginScope(TState state)
        return null;

    public bool IsEnabled(LogLevel logLevel)
        return logLevel == _config.LogLevel;

    public void Log(LogLevel logLevel, EventId eventId, TState state, Exception exception, Func formatter)
        if (!IsEnabled(logLevel))

        lock (_lock)
            if (_config.EventId == 0 || _config.EventId == eventId.Id)
                var color = Console.ForegroundColor;
                Console.ForegroundColor = _config.Color;
                Console.WriteLine($"{logLevel.ToString()} - {eventId.Id} - {_name} - {formatter(state, exception)}");
                Console.ForegroundColor = color;

We need to lock the actual console output, because we will get some race conditions where wrong log entries get colored with the wrong color, because the console itself is not really thread save.

If this is done we can start to plug in the new logger to the configuration:


var config = new ColoredConsoleLoggerConfiguration
    LogLevel = LogLevel.Information,
    Color = ConsoleColor.Red
logging.AddProvider(new ColoredConsoleLoggerProvider(config));

If needed you are able to clear all the previously added logger providers. Than we call AddProvider to add a new instance of our ColoredConsoleLoggerProvider with the specific settings. We could also add some more instances of the provider with different settings.

This shows ho to handle different log levels in a a different way. You can use this to send an emails on hard errors, to log debug messages to a different log sink than regular informational messages and so on.

In many cases it doesn't make sense to write a custom logger because there are already many good third party loggers, like elmah, log4net and NLog. In the next section I'm going to show you how to use NLog in ASP.NET Core

Plug-in an existing Third-Party logger provider

NLog was one of the very first loggers, which was available as a .NET Standard library and usable in ASP.NET Core. NLog also already provides a Logger Provider to easily plug it into ASP.NET Core.

The next snippet shows a typical NLog.Config that defines two different sinks to log all messages in one log file and custom messages only into another file:







We than need to add the NLog ASP.NET Core package from NuGet:

dotnet add package NLog.Web.AspNetCore

(Be sure you are in the project directory before you execute that command)

Now you only need to add NLog in the ConfigureLogging method in the Program.cs

logging.AddProvider(new NLogLoggerProvider());

The first line configures NLog to use the previously created NLog.Config and the second line adds the NLogLoggerProvider to the list of logging providers. Here you can add as many logger providers you need.


The good thing of hiding the basic configuration is only to clean up the newly scaffolded projects and to keep the actual start as simple as possible. The developer is able to focus on the actual features. But the more the application grows the more important is logging. The default logging configuration is easy and it works like charm, but in production you need a persisted log to see errors from the past. So you need to add a custom logging or a more flexible logger like NLog or log4net.

To learn more about ASP.NET Core configuration have a look into the next part of the series: Customizing ASP.NET Core Part 02: Configuration.

New Blog Series: Customizing ASP.​NET Core

Tuesday, September 18, 2018 12:00 AM

With this post I want to introduce a new blog series about things you can or maybe need to customize in ASP.NET Core. Initially this series will contain ten different topics. Maybe later I'll write some more posts about that.

The initial topics are based on my talk about Customizing ASP.NET Core. I did this talk several times in German and English. I did the talk on the .NET Conf 2018 as well.

Unfortunately on the .NET Conf the talk started with pretty bad audio for some reasons. The first five minutes can be moved directly to the trash IMHO. I also could only show 7 out of 10 demos, even if I tried to get all the demos into 45 minutes one day before. I'm almost sure the audio problem wasn't on my side. Via the router I disconnected almost all devices from the internet during the our I was presenting and it went well before the presentation when we did the latest tech check.

Anyway, after five minutes the audio went a lot better and the audience was able to follow the rest of the presentation.

For this series I'm going to follow the same order as in that presentation, which is the order from bottom to top, from the server configuration parts, over Web.API up to the MVC topics.

The series topics

Do you want to see that talk?

If you are interested in this talk about Customizing ASP.NET Core, feel free to drop me a comment, a message via Twitter or an email. I'm able to do it remotely via Skype, Skype for Business or on side, if the travel costs are covered somehow. For free at community events, like Meetups or user group meetings and fairly paid on commercial events.

Discover more possible talks on Sessionize:

Live streaming ideas

Friday, July 20, 2018 12:00 AM

With this post, I'd like to share some ideas about two live streaming shows with you. It would be cool to get some feedback from you, especially from the German speaking readers as well. The first idea is about an German speaking .NET Developer Community Standup and the second one is about a live coding stream (English or German), both hosted on Google Hangouts.

A German speaking .NET Developer Community Standup

Since the beginning of the ASP.NET Community Standup, I watch this show more or less regularly. I think I missed only two or three shows. Because of the different time zone it is almost not possible to watch the live stream. Anyway. I really like the format of that show.

Also since a few years the number of user group attendees decreases. In my user group sometimes only two or three attendees show up, even if we have a lot more registrations via meetup. We (Olivier Giss and me) have kinda fun hosting the user group, but it is also hard to push much effort in it for just a handful of loyal attendees. Since a while we record the sessions using skype for business or google hangouts and push them to YouTube. This gives some more folks the chance to see the talks. We thought a lot about the reasons and tried to change some things to get more attendees, but that didn't really work.

This is the reason why I'm thinking laud about a .NET Developer Community Standup for the German speaking region (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) since months.

I'd like to find two more people to join the team to host the show. Would be cool to have a person from Austria as well as from Switzerland. Since I'm a swiss MVP, I could also take over the swiss part in behalf ;-) In that case I would like to have another person from Germany. One host per country would be cool.

Three host is a nice number and it wouldn't be necessary for the hosts to be available every time we do a live stream. Anyone interested in joining the team?

To keep it simple I'd also use google hangouts to stream the show, and it is not necessary to have an high end steaming equipment. A good headset and a good internet connection should be enough.

In the show I would like to go threw some interesting community and technology news. Talking about some random stuff and I'd also like to invite special guests, who can show us things they did or who would like to talk about special things. This should be a lazy show about interesting stuff about technology and community. I'd also like to give community leads the chance to talk about their work and their events.

What are you thinking about that? Are you interested in?

If yes, I would set up a GitHub repo to collect ideas and topics to talk about.

Live Coding via Live Stream on Google Hangouts

Another idea is inspired by Jeff Fritz live stream on Twitch called "Fritz and Friends". The recorded streams are published to YouTube afterwards. I really like this live stream, even if it's a completely different kind of video to watch. Jeff is permanently in discussion with the users in the chat, while working on his projects. This is kinda wired and makes the show a little nervous, but it is also really interesting. The really cool thing is that he accepts pull request from his audience and he discuss their changes with the audience while working on his project.

I would do such a live stream as well, there were a few projects I would like to work on:

Maybe it makes also sense to invite a special guest to talk about specific topics while working on the project. e.g. inviting Dominick Baier to implement authentication to the developer community platform.

What if I do the same thing? Are you interested in? What would be the best Language for that kind of life stream?

If you are interested, I would also set up a GitHub repo to collect ideas and topics to talk about and I would setup additional repos per project.

What do you think?

Do you like these ideas? Do you have any other idea? Please drop me a comment and share your thoughts :-)

Configuring HTTPS in ASP.NET Core 2.1

Monday, July 9, 2018 12:00 AM

Finally HTTPS gets into ASP.NET Core. It was there before back in 1.1, but was kinda tricky to configure. It was available in 2.0 bit not configured by default. Now it is part of the default configuration and pretty much visible and present to the developers who will create a new ASP.NET Core 2.1 project.

So the title of that blog post is pretty much misleading, because you don't need to configure HTTPS. because it already is. So let's have a look how it is configured and how it can be customized. First create a new ASP.NET Core 2.1 web application.

Did you already install the latest .NET Core SDK? If not, go to to download and install the latest version for your platform.

Open a console and CD to your favorite location to play around with new projects. It is C:\git\aspnet\ in my case.

mkdir HttpsSecureWeb && cd HttpSecureWeb
dotnet new mvc -n HttpSecureWeb -o HttpSecureWeb
dotnet run

This commands will create and run a new application called HttpSecureWeb. And you will see HTTPS the first time in the console output by running an newly created ASP.NET Core 2.1 application:

There are two different URLs where Kestrel is listening on: https://localhost:5001 and http://localhost:5000

If you go to the Configure method in the Startup.cs there are some new middlewares used to prepare this web to use HTTPS:

In the Production and Staging environment mode there is this middleware:


This enables HSTS (HTTP Strinct Transport Protocol), which is a HTTP/2 feature to avoid man-in-the-middle attacks. It tells the browser to cache the certificate for the specific host-headers and for a specific time range. If the certificate changes before the time range ends, something is wrong with the page. (More about HSTS)

The next new middleware redirects all requests without HTTPS to use the HTTPS version:


If you call http://localhost:5000, you get redirected immediately to https://localhost:5001. This makes sense if you want to enforce HTTPS.

So from the ASP.NET Core perspective all is done to run the web using HTTPS. Unfortunately the Certificate is missing. For the production mode you need to buy a valid trusted certificate and to install it in the windows certificate store. For the Development mode, you are able to create a development certificate using Visual Studio 2017 or the .NET CLI. VS 2017 is creating a certificate for you automatically.

Using the .NET CLI tool "dev-certs" you are able to manage your development certificates, like exporting them, cleaning all development certificates, trusting the current one and so on. Just type the following command to get more detailed information:

dotnet dev-certs https --help

On my machine I trusted the development certificate to not get the ugly error screen in the browser about an untrusted certificate and an unsecure connection every time I want to debug a ASP.NET Core application. This works quite well:

dotnet dev-cert https --trust

This command trusts the development certificate, by adding it to the certificate store or to the keychain on Mac.

On Windows you should use the certificate store to register HTTPS certificated. This is the most secured way on Windows machines. But I also like the idea to store the password protected certificate directly in the web folder or somewhere on the web server. This makes it pretty easy to deploy the application to different platforms, because Linux and Mac use different ways to store the certificated. Fortunately there is a way in ASP.NET Core to create a HTTPS connection using a file certificate which is stored on the hard drive. ASP.NET Core is completely customizable. If you want to replace the default certification handling, feel free to do it.

To change the default handling, open the Program.cs and take a quick look at the code, especially to the method CreateWebHostBuilder:

public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string[] args) =>

This method creates the default WebHostBuilder. This has a lot of stuff preconfigured, which is working great in the most scenarios. But it is possible to override all of the default settings here and to replace it with some custom configurations. We need to tell the Kestrel webserver which host and port he need to listen on and we are able to configure the ListenOptions for specific ports. In this ListenOptions we can use HTTPS and pass in the certificate file and a password for that file:

public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string[] args) =>
        .UseKestrel(options =>
            options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5000);
            options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5001, listenOptions =>
                listenOptions.UseHttps("certificate.pfx", "topsecret");

Usually we would use the hardcoded values from a configuration file or environment variables, instead of hardcoding it.

Be sure the certificate is password protected using a long password or even better a pass-phrase. Be sure to not store the password or the pass-phrase into a configuration file. In development mode you should use the user secrets to store such secret date and in production mode the Azure Key Vault could be an option.


I hope this helps to get you a rough overview over the the usage of HTTPS in ASP.NET Core. This is not really a deep dive, but tries to explain what are the new middlewares good for and how to configure HTTPS for different platforms.

BTW: I just saw in the blog post about HTTPS improvements, about HSTS in ASP.NET Core, there is a way to store the HTTPS configuration in the launchSettings.json. This is an easy way to pass in environment variables on startup to the application. The samples also shows to add the certificate password to this settings file. Please never ever do this! Because a file is easily shared to a source code repository or any other way, so the password inside is shared as well. Please use different mechanisms to set passwords in an application, like the already mentioned user secrets or the Azure Key Vault.

Four times in a row

Monday, July 2, 2018 12:00 AM

One year later, it is the July 1st and I got the email from the Global MVP Administrator. I got the MVP award the fourth time in a row :)

I'm pretty proud and honored about that and I'm really happy to be part of the great MVP community one year more. I'm also looking forward to the Global MVP Summit next year to meet all the other MVPs from around the world.

Still not really a fan-boy...!?

I'm also proud of being a MVP, because I never called myself a Microsoft fan-boy. And sometimes, I also criticize some tools and platforms built by Microsoft (I feel like a bad boy). But I like most of the development tools built by Microsoft and I like to use the tools, and frameworks and I really like the new and open Microsoft. The way how Microsoft now supports more than its own technologies and platforms. I like using VSCode, Typescript and Webpack to create NodeJS applications. I like VSCode and .NET Core on Linux to build Applications on a different platform than Windows. I also like to play around with UWP Apps on Windows for IoT on a Raspberry PI.

There are much more possibilities, much more platforms, much more customers to reach, using the current Microsoft development stack. And it is really fun to play with it, to use it in real project, to write about it in .NET magazines, in this blog and to talk about it in the user groups and on conferences.

In the last year being an MVP, I also learned that it is kinda fun to contribute to Microsoft's open source projects, being a part of that project and to see my own work in that projects. If you like open source as well, contribute to the the open source projects. Make the projects better, make the documentations better.

I also need to say Thanks

But I wouldn't get honored again without such a great development community. I wouldn't continue to contribute to the community without that positive feedback and without that great people. This is why the biggest "Thank You" goes to the development community :)

And like last year, I also need to say "Thank You" to my great family (my lovely wife and my three kids) which supports me in spending so much time to contribute to the community. I also need to say Thanks to the YooApplications AG, my colleagues and my boss for supporting me and allowing me to use parts of my working time to contribute the the community.

Creating a signature pad using Canvas and ASP.​NET Core Razor Pages

Tuesday, June 5, 2018 12:00 AM

In one of our projects, we needed to add a possibility to add signatures to PDF documents. A technician fills out a checklist online and a responsible person and the technician need to sign the checklist afterwards. The signatures then gets embedded into a generated pdf document together with the results of the checklist. The signatures must be created on a web UI, running on an iPad Pro.

It was pretty clear that we need to use the HTML5 canvas element and to capture the pointer movements. Fortunately we stumbled upon a pretty cool library on GitHub, created by Szymon Nowak from Poland. It is the super awesome Signature Pad written in TypeScript and available as NPM and Yarn package. It is also possible to use a CDN to use the Signature Pad.

Use Signature Pad

Using Signature Pad is really easy and works well without any configuration. Let me show you in a quick way how it works:

To play around with it, I created a new ASP.NET Core Razor Pages web using the dotnet CLI:

dotnet new razor -n SignaturePad -o SignaturePad

I added a new razor page called Signature and added it to the menu in the _Layout.cshtml. I created a simple form and placed some elements in it:

The form posts the content to the current URL, which is the same Razor page, but the different HTTP method handler. We will have a look later on.

The canvas is the most important thing. This is the area where the signature gets drawn. I added a border to make the pad boundaries visible on the screen. I add a button to accept the signature. This means we lock the canvas and write the image data to the input field added as last element. I also added a second button to submit the form. The image is just to validate the signature and is not really needed, but I was curious about, how it looks in an image tag.

This is not the nicest HTML code but works for a quick test.

Right after the form I added a script area to render the JavaScript to the end of the page. To get it running quickly, I use jQuery to access the HTML elements. I also copied the signature_pad.min.js into the project, instead of using the CDN version

@section Scripts{

As you can see, creating the Signature Pad is simply done by creating a new instance of SignaturePad and passing the canvas as an argument. On click at the accept button, I start working with the pad. The function toDataURL() generates an image data URL that can be directly used as image source, like I do in the next line. After that I store the result as value in the input field to send it to the server. In Production this should be a hidden field. at the end I switch the Signature Pad off to lock the canvas and the user cannot manipulate the signature anymore.

Handling the Image Date URL with C##

The image data URL looks like this:


So after the comma the image is a base 64 encoded string. The data before the comma describes the image type and the encoding. I now send the complete data URL to the server and we need to decode the string.

public void OnPost()
    if (String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(SignatureDataUrl)) return;

    var base64Signature = SignatureDataUrl.Split(",")[1];            
    var binarySignature = Convert.FromBase64String(base64Signature);

    System.IO.File.WriteAllBytes("Signature.png", binarySignature);

On the page model we need to create a new method OnPost() to handle the HTTP POST method. Inside we first check whether the bound property has a value or not. Then we split the string by comma and convert the base 64 string to an byte array.

With this byte array we can do whatever we need to do. In the current project I store the image directly in the PDF and in this demo I just store the data in an image on the hard drive.


As mentioned this is just a quick demo with some ugly code. But the rough idea could be used to make it better in Angular or React. To learn more about the Signature Pad visit the repository:

This example also shows what is possible with HTML5 this times. I really like the possibilities of HTML5 and the HTML5 APIs used with JavaScript.

Hope this helps :-)

A generic logger factory facade for classic ASP.NET

Friday, April 13, 2018 12:00 AM

ASP.NET Core already has this feature. There is a ILoggerFactory to create a logger. You are able to inject the ILoggerFactory to your component (Controller, Service, etc.) and to create a named logger out of it. During testing you are able to replace this factory with a mock, to not test the logger as well and to not have an additional dependency to setup.

Recently we had the same requirement in a classic ASP.NET project, where we use Ninject to enable dependency injection and log4net to log all the stuff we do and all exceptions. One important requirement is a named logger per component.

Creating named loggers

Usually log4net gets created inside the components as a private static instance:

private static readonly ILog _logger = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(HomeController));

There already is a static factory method to create a named logger. Unfortunately this isn't really testable anymore and we need a different solution.

We could create a bunch of named logger in advance and register them to Ninject, which obviously is not the right solution. We need to have a more generic solution. We figured out two different solutions:

// would work well
public MyComponent(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
    _loggerA = loggerFactory.GetLogger(typeof(MyComponent));
    _loggerB = loggerFactory.GetLogger("MyComponent");
    _loggerC = loggerFactory.GetLogger();
// even more elegant
public MyComponent(
    ILoggerFactory loggerFactoryA
    ILoggerFactory loggerFactoryB)
    _loggerA = loggerFactoryA.GetLogger();
    _loggerB = loggerFactoryB.GetLogger();

We decided to go with the second approach, which is a a simpler solution. This needs a dependency injection container that supports open generics like Ninject, Autofac and LightCore.

Implementing the LoggerFactory

Using Ninject the binding of open generics looks like this:


This binding creates an instance of LoggerFactory using the requested generic argument. If I request for an ILoggerFactory, Ninject creates an instance of LoggerFactory.

We register this as an singleton to reuse the ILog instances as we would do using the usual way to create the ILog instance in a private static variable.

The implementation of the LoggerFactory is pretty easy. We use the generic argument to create the log4net ILog instance:

public interface ILoggerFactory
	ILog GetLogger();

public class LoggerFactory : ILoggerFactory
    private ILog _logger;
    public ILog GetLogger()
        if (_logger == null)
            var type = typeof(T);
            _logger = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(T));
        return _logger;

We need to ensure the logger is created before creating a new one. Because Ninject creates a new instance of the LoggerFactory per generic argument, the LoggerFactory don't need to care about the different loggers. It just stores a single specific logger.


Now we are able to create one or more named loggers per component.

What we cannot do, using this approach is to create individual named loggers, using a specific string as a name. There is a type needed that gets passed as generic argument. So every time we need an individual named logger we need to create a specific type. In our case this is not a big problem.

If you don't like to create types just to create individual named loggers, feel free to implement a non generic LoggerFactory and make a generic GetLogger method as well as a GetLogger method that accepts strings as logger names.

Creating Dummy Data Using GenFu

Wednesday, April 11, 2018 12:00 AM

Two years ago I already wrote about playing around with GenFu and I still use it now, as mentioned in that post. When I do a demo, or when I write blog posts and articles, I often need dummy data and I use GenFu to create it. But every time I use it in a talk or a demo, somebody still asks me a question about it,

Actually I really forgot about that blog post and decided to write about it again this morning because of the questions I got. Almost accidently I stumbled upon this "old" post.

I wont create a new one. Now worries ;-) Because of the questions I just want to push this topic a little bit to the top:

Playing around with GenFu

GenFu on GitHub

PM> Install-Package GenFu

Read about it, grab it and use it!

It is one of the most time saving tools ever :)

Running and Coding

Friday, March 30, 2018 12:00 AM

I wasn't really sporty before two years, but anyway active. I was also forced to be active with three little kids and a sporty and lovely women. But anyway, a job where I mostly sit in a comfortable chair, even great food and good southern German beers also did its work. When I first met my wife, I had around 80 Kg, what is good for my size of 178cm. But my weight increased up to 105Kg until Christmas 2015. This was way too much I thought. Until then I always tried to reduce it by doing some more cycling, more hiking and some gym, but it didn't really worked out well.

Anyway, there is not a more effective way to loose weight than running. It is btw. tree times more effective than cycling. I tried it a lot in the past, but it pretty much hurts in the lower legs and I stopped it more than once.

Running the agile way

I tried it again in Easter 2016 in a little different way, and it worked. I tried to do it the same way as in a perfect software project:

I did it in an agile way, using pretty small goals to get as much success as possible.

Also I bought me fitness watch to count steps, calories, levels and to measure the hart rate while running, to get some more challenges to do. At the same time I changed food a lot.

It sounds weird and funny, but it worked really well. I lost 20Kg since then!

I think it was important to not set to huge goals. I just wanted to loose 20Kg. I didn't set a time limit, or something like this.

I knew it hurts in the lower legs while running. I started to learn a lot of running and the different stiles of running. I chose the way of easy running which worked pretty well with natural running shoes and barefoot shoes. This also worked well for me.

Finding time to run

Finding time was the hardest thing. In the past I always thought that I'm too busy to run. I discussed it a lot with the family and we figured out the best time to run was during lunch time, because I need to walk the dog anyway and this also was an option to run with the dog. This was also a good thing for our huge dog.

Running at lunch time had another good advantage: I get the brain cleaned a little bit after four to five hours of work. (Yes, I usually start between 7 to 8 in the morning.) Running is great when you are working on software projects with a huge level of complexity. Unfortunately when I'm working in Basel, I cannot go run, because there is now shower available. But I'm still able to run three to four times a week.

Starting to run

The first runs were a real pain. I just chose a small lap of 2,5km, because I needed to learn running as the first step. Also because of the pain in the lower legs, I chose to run shorter tracks up-hill. Why up-hill? Because this is more exhausting than running leveled-up. So I had short up-hill running phases and longer quick walking phases. Just a few runs later the running phases start to be a little bit longer and longer.

This was the first success just a few runs later. That was great. it was even greater when I finished my first kilometer after 1,5 months running every second day. That was amazing.

On every run there was a success and that really pushed me. But I not only succeeded on running, I also started to loose weight, which pushed me even more. So the pain wasn't too hard and I continued running.

Some weeks later I ran the entire lap of 2.5km. I was running the whole lap not really fast but without a walking pause. Some more motivation.

I continued running just this 2.5km for a few more weeks to get some success on personal records on this lap.

Low carb

I mentioned the change with food. I changed to low-carb diet. Which is in general a way to reduce the consumption of sugar. Every kind of sugar, which means bread, potatoes, pasta, rice and corn as well. In the first phase of three months I almost completely stopped eating carbs. After that phase, started to eat a little of them. I also had one cheating-day per week when I was able to eat the normal way.

After 6 Months of eating less carbs and running, I lost around 10Kg, which was amazing and I was absolutely happy with this progress.

Cycling as a compensation

As already mentioned I run every second day. The days between I used my new mountain bike to climb the hills around the city where I live. Actually, it really was a kind of compensation because cycling uses other parts of the legs. (Except when I run up-hill).

Using my smart watch, I was able to measure that running burns three times more calories per hour in average than cycling in the same time. This is a measurement done on my person only and cannot adopt to any other person, but actually it makes sense to me.

Unfortunately cycling during the winter was a different kind of pain. It hurts the face, the feet and the hands. It was too cold. so I stopped it, if the temperature was lower than 5 degrees.

Extending the lap

After a few weeks running the entire 2.5Km, I increased the length to 4.5. This was more exhausting than expected. Two kilometers more needs a completely new kind of training. I needed to enforce myself to not run too fast at the beginning. I needed to start to manage my power. Again I started slowly and used some walking pauses to get the whole lap done. During the next months the walking pauses had decrease more and more until I didn't need a walking pause anymore on this lap.

The first official run

Nine months later I wanted to challenge myself a little bit and attended the first public run. It was a new years eve run. Pretty cold than, but unexpectedly a lot of fun. I was running with my brother which was a good idea. The atmosphere before and during the run was pretty special and I still like it a lot. I got three challenges done during this run. I reached the finish (1) and I wasn't the last one who passed the finish line (2). That was great. I also got a new personal record on the 5km (3).

This was done one year and three months ago. I did exactly the same run again last new years eve and got a new personal record, was faster than my brother and reached the finish. Amazing. More success to push myself.

The first 10km

During the last year I increased the number of kilometers, attended some more public runs. In September 2015 I finished my first public 10km run. Even more success to push me foreword.

I didn't increase the number of kilometer fast. Just one by one kilometer. Trained one to three months on this range and added some more kilometer. Last spring I started to do a longer run during the weekends, just because I had time to do this. On workdays it doesn't make sense to run more than 7 km because this would also increase the time used for the lunch break. I tried to just use one hour for the lunch run, including the shower and changing the cloths.

Got it done

Last November I got it done: I actually did loose 20kg since I started to run. This was really great. It was a great thing to see a weight less than 85kg.


How did running changed my life? it changed it a lot. I cannot really live without running for more than two days. I get really nervous than.

Do I feel better since I started running? Because of the sports I am more tired than before, I have muscle ache, I also had two sport accidents. But I'm pretty much more relaxed I think. Physically the most time it feels bad but in a wired positive way because I feel I've done something.

Also some annoying work was done more easily. I really looking foreword to the next lunch break to run the six or seven kilometer with the dog, or to ride the bike up and down the hills and to get the brain cleaned up.

I'm running on almost every weather except it is too slippery because of ice or snow. Fresh snow is fine, mud is fun, rain I don't feel anymore, sunny is even better and heat is challenging. Only the dog doesn't love warm weather.

Crazy? Yes, but I love it.

Yo you want to follow me on Strava?